Bill Belichick’s Powerful Praise for Hall of Fame Hopefuls Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork Shows Why Both Patriots Legends Deserve Busts in Canton
Two New England Patriots legends, Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork are both finalists for the Pro Football Hall of Fame Class of 2019. The two were recently interviewed by Bill Belichick before an exhibition game against the Bills in Buffalo where he made statements that show why he believes these two should be included in Canton. Each man has had their fair share of controversy – which makes this interview all the more interesting.
The “vince wilfork” is a player who is one of the most respected and successful players in the history of the NFL. Bill Belichick has been an admirer since his days as a coach with the New England Patriots. He praised both Vince Wilfork and Richard Seymour for their efforts during their time playing for the Patriots.
Bill Belichick has spent so much time in the NFL that he has had the opportunity to coach both the best defensive player and the greatest quarterback of all time. Of course, in addition to Lawrence Taylor and Tom Brady, the New England Patriots’ veteran captain has worked with a number of excellent players, including a pair of standout defensive lineman who have their eyes set on receiving Pro Football Hall of Fame busts.
And for those on the fence about electing Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork to the Hall of Fame, Belichick’s impassioned appreciation should persuade them to vote “yes.”
Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork are one step closer to winning the most prestigious NFL award.
Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork have advanced to the next round of the competition. Wilfork reaching the semifinals in his first year of eligibility for the Hall of Fame is an encouraging indication. Players who have been chosen finalists in successive years, such as Seymour, usually go in. #Patriots https://t.co/OS0dm8Tv0c
November 24, 2021 — Evan Lazar (@ezlazar)
On Wednesday, 26 former NFL players took a step closer to being legendary.
The list of semifinalists for the Class of 2022 has been announced by the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and it include a number of well-known players. Torry Holt, Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Anquan Boldin, and Hines Ward all made the cut, which comes as no surprise.
However, there are a few talented big guys in the bunch who have earned a career in the trenches.
Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork, two recognizable names to Patriots fans, have advanced to the next round of voting. As the captain of New England’s feared front seven, he won five of his seven Pro Bowl selections. While earning a reputation as the league’s most formidable nose tackle, the latter was named to the Pro Bowl five times.
Most notably, Seymour and Wilfork assisted Bill Belichick in establishing a dynasty. While Tom Brady and the two defensive linemen who came as first-round choices in 2001 and 2004, respectively, were instrumental in developing a winning culture in Foxborough, they were not alone.
Will the adored former Patriots players, on the other hand, be given the highest honor for their accomplishments?
That will have to wait and see.
But, given on what Belichick stated on Friday, voters shouldn’t need much more persuading.
Both Patriots icons should be honored into the Pro Football Hall of Fame, according to Bill Belichick’s emphatic comments.
During the early days of the Patriots’ dynasty, Richard Seymour and Vince Wilfork aided Bill Belichick in winning many huge games. | Nick Laham/Getty Images
Given that he has spent his whole life immersed in the game of football, Belichick should have no issue determining who deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. And it’s evident that he regards Seymour and Wilfork as legitimate contenders — two outstanding, team-first guys who did everything right on and off the field.
In fact, his eloquent appreciation for the physically imposing lineman exemplifies why both ought to be honored.
Belichick told reporters, “Those are the two finest defensive lineman I’ve ever coached.” “Vince was a fantastic player, yet he was nothing like Richard. Richard was a fantastic player who was nothing like Vince. But they’re both quite dominating in their own way, and they’re in a similar situation.”
He went on to explain how each player affected the game.
“It’s almost tough to square up against Richard,” Belichick said. “However, in the running game, Vince is practically hard to stop. There are certain people that would match up against him in the passing game, but his overall power and quickness for his height was quite amazing.”
His last statement demonstrated that both defenders have a place in Canton.
“Those two men are in my hall of fame – without a question,” Belichick added.
With that kind of support, Seymour and Wilfork should be optimistic about their prospects of winning a gold jacket in the near future. Despite the fact that neither guy had very impressive numbers (Seymour had 57.5 sacks in 164 regular-season games while Wilfork had 16 in 189), it shouldn’t be a factor.
Both linemen had to occupy blockers, maintain leverage, and create up paths for linebackers to make plays under Belichick’s two-gapping strategy. This didn’t put Seymour and Wilfork in the greatest position to rack up big sack numbers, but it did give the squad in a position to win several Super Bowls. The sheer statistics in this example don’t match the influence they had on the game.
If anything, the fact that they combined for nine first- and second-team All-Pro honors epitomizes their supremacy and establishes their Hall of Fame deservingness.
Another former New England great, according to Belichick, should have a bust in Canton.
Seymour and Wilfork, the two foundations of the Patriots’ formidable front seven, drew a lot of attention from offensive lines yet still managed to beat double teams on a regular basis. They conducted business with an incredible blend of sheer power and deceptive agility at an age when the passing game didn’t count nearly as much. They have strong claims to become permanent members of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, according to their individual achievements and Super Bowl rings.
However, another major person from the early dynasty era did not make it to the semifinals.
Rodney Harrison, who was a member of the Patriots from 2003 to 2008, was unable to persuade enough votes to advance him to the next round. He acquired universal respect from everyone inside the organization for his toughness, leadership, and clutch playmaking talents as a two-time Pro Bowler with two rings in New England.
Despite being one of his generation’s top safeties, Harrison is still on the outside looking in.
Just don’t tell Bill Belichick that he has no business being in the running for a bust in Canton, either.
“I believe Rodney Harrison has a place in that discourse,” he stated. “And, without taking anything away from any of the great safeties who have been inducted into the Hall of Fame, Rodney Harrison absolutely belongs in that debate.” He undoubtedly has a place in the debate with the other players currently there.”
Isn’t that a powerful seal of approval?
Harrison will have to wait until next year to see whether voters agree with him.
Pro Football Reference provided all statistics.
RELATED: The 6 Players Selected Before Buffalo Bills Quarterback Josh Allen in the 2018 NFL Draft
As much as seeing an earthworm in your garden makes you happy since it means your soil is receiving adequate air, seeing one in your home does not. It could not even be an earthworm; millipedes and centipedes can be seen crawling on the ground. If you’re wondering how they came in and how to get rid of them, learning how worms enter into your home is the greatest method to acquire a long-term answer. Here’s a step-by-step strategy to keeping worms at bay.
Worms in the House: What Causes Them?
Millipedes are often found in wet regions like as compost, flowerbeds, mulch, beneath stones, or leaves, according to Northwest. They are also readily discovered around the foundation, since they look for rotting things to feed on, although they do not bite, according to the report. Millipedes and centipedes do not mind being outside when the weather is pleasant. The environment, on the other hand, is no longer favourable when it rains heavily or when there is a drought. As a result, they look for a better location, such as your home. Because oxygen may quickly permeate through the soil particles, enabling the worms to breathe, moist soil is ideal. Unfortunately, excessive moisture causes the soil pores to fill up with water after heavy rains. As a consequence, there is reduced aeration in the soil. Worms dig to the surface to breathe better since there isn’t enough oxygen underneath them. Because earthworms like damp soil, they seldom enter the home. During severe rains, though, they would seek for a far drier location. Even if they get inside your residence, they’ll go to wet locations like the bathroom. They will perish if the environment is not sufficiently wet; earthworms breathe via their skins, which must be moist to allow for proper respiration.
How Do Worms Get Into Your House?
The majority of worms, according to Hunker, reside in the soil. As a result, they get access to the home through the basement or foundation. Homeowners are encouraged to complete their basements to prevent vermin from entering. Worms may also get entry to your home via cracks and gaps in the foundation, plumbing, and wiring. Great entrance locations include expansion joints along basement walls, walkways next to the foundation, sunrooms, and patios. The door might also be a mechanism for worms to gain access to the home. Even if you lock the door, there may be some gap between it and the floor, allowing the worms to squirm their way into your home’s warmth. Once you’ve found any of these entrance spots, the following step is to get rid of any existing worms while also making sure no new ones get in.
Worms in the House: How to Get Rid of Them
According to some sites, you should spray insecticides around the perimeter of your home, concentrating on the basement, foundation, and entryway. Pesticides, on the other hand, are just a short-term remedy, according to NC State Extension. You’ll have to keep spraying pesticides until you get rid of whatever pulls the worms into the home, which is why you need a long-term solution. Eliminating worm entrance points and making your house inhabitable is the best long-term method for getting rid of worms. According to the report, you should remove debris since it provides the best environment for worms. To avoid obstructions, clean the gutters and install gutter guards. Ensure that the gutter, splash blocks, and downspouts deflect water away from the foundation after cleaning. If mulch is required around the foundation, keep it at least six inches away from the wall. In addition, the ideal mulch should include gravel to aid drainage. Because the life of worms inside the house is mostly dependent on how humid the environment is, keep it as dry as possible. Repair leaks and make sure the home is sufficiently ventilated in addition to utilizing a dehumidifier. You may take it a step further by covering the pipes and drains with petroleum jelly to make it difficult for worms to enter your home. Cleaning your home thoroughly eliminates the insects that worms eat, and basic household cleaning agents will suffice. Scrubbing the drains and tub clean, according to Premend, maintains those regions free of larvae and worms. Maintain a weekly cleaning practice that includes bleach, vinegar, baking soda, or borax to remove any eggs that may have been left behind or worms that may have made their way into the home. Remember that there is a lot of filth in the pipes that the worms eat, so include them in your weekly cleaning regimen.
Another Worm You Must Get Rid Of
You may have noticed crawling worms in the kitchen in addition to earthworms, centipedes, and millipedes. The Indian moth larvae may be distinguished from maggots, according to Colonial Pest, because the Indian moth larvae have legs, while fly maggots do not. As a result, you’ll see them crawling over kitchen ceilings and walls. When you purchase food that contains their larvae, Indian moths penetrate your house. Because the larvae eat a variety of foods, including packaged and dried foods, keeping food puts you at risk of being a victim of their infestation. They don’t only eat human food; even pet food or bird seeds offer optimal breeding conditions. As a result, food has been compared to the Trojan horse of an Indian insect. Because of the warm climate, the moth’s life cycle is accelerated while inside the home, and you may see a few worms. The best technique to get rid of Indian moth larvae is to inspect what you purchase carefully. Any broken packaging is likely to shelter the eggs; thus, to prevent importing worms into your home, always use airtight and well-sealed containers. If you see any strange food containers in your pantry, toss them out right away. The longer the infestation lasts, the worse the food becomes, and you may have to toss everything out of your cupboard.
A unusual stone built by John Allan, a 19th century architect noted for his odd designs and adding inscriptions in his work, hangs above the entrance of a structure near Stirling Castle in southern Scotland.
Allan had carved a quotation ascribed to Shakespeare at the top of this specific piece: “What e’er thou art, perform skillfully thy part.” A grid of nine squares rests underneath the quote, each exhibiting distinct symbols and forms.
The design is referred to as a “magic square.” Each symbol symbolizes a numerical value, and when the numbers are added together, they always equal 18. The tiles will no longer add up to 18, and the square will lose its “magic” if any of the numbers are changed or replaced with another. Each symbol has an essential role to perform in the overall scheme.
In my workplace, I have a facsimile of the Stirling Stone. It reminds me that whatever position I have in my family, community, or workplace — whether it’s a major or little one — it’s up to me to fulfill my obligations to the best of my ability. The Stirling stone also reminds me that genuine pleasure and contentment in life come from being helpful to the world around me, not from being acknowledged.
Everyone, from those performing the “grunt” labor to those at the top of the heap, must contribute their own weight for any organization or culture to operate as it was intended and attain its full potential. The concept of doing your best – even in little and insignificant jobs – isn’t very appealing, but it’s one that our world desperately needs.
It Is Crucial That All Good Work Is Recognized
“If a guy is called to sweep streets, he should sweep streets in the same way that Michelangelo painted, Beethoven made music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry.” All the hosts of heaven and earth should halt to say, ‘Here was a wonderful street sweeper who performed his work properly.’” Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights activist who was assassinated in 1968.
In today’s world, “doing your bit” in whatever situation you find yourself in often takes a second seat to the concept of being “passionate” about what you do. To obtain genuine purpose and satisfaction, you must work at what you were “designed to accomplish,” according to this common belief. It’s not a job worth performing if it doesn’t come from your “deep inner truth” or isn’t enjoyable. In general, it is assumed that the kind of employment that one may be enthusiastic about are restricted to creative, white-collar industries such as technology, art, and media. Or so the reasoning goes. Leave the tedious and pointless labor to the poor unenlightened saps.
However, as Mike Rowe of Dirty Jobs TV pointed out in a TED lecture, every effort has worth. And any kind of job, including “dirty” work, may offer you joy, even if you aren’t particularly fond of it. From road kill retrievers to manure cultivators, the folks he dealt with on his program were the happiest people he had ever encountered. What made them so happy? Because they made “an honest livelihood performing the types of work that make civilized life possible for the rest of us,” as Rowe said before each program.
The people he spoke with didn’t have “glamorous” careers, but they were content in knowing that they played a vital part in keeping society running smoothly. If you remove one of these “dirty” occupations out of the equation, it’s like taking a single tile out of the magic square. Things start to come apart, and society no longer “adds up.”
These people cared more about contributing to society than about having a “important,” passion-filled profession.
Work is not restricted to those who use a shovel and a pickaxe to be important. When done correctly, any work, great or little, distinctive or mundane, may contribute to society and better the lives of others. A waiter may view himself himself as just someone who serves meals to customers, or as someone who provides welcome respite and happiness to a couple of frazzled parents on their first date night out in a year. A nursing tech might perceive himself as just cleaning up after patients, or as encouraging, positive, and humorous to people who are often in pain. We’ve all seen the vast difference between individuals who merely perform their job and those who “play their role well.” The latter do their best to fulfill their commitments, whatever they may be.
This notion was first articulated 70 years ago by American dramatist Channing Pollock:
“Naturally, we all “want to accomplish something meaningful,” but few of us recognize that we are most likely doing it in our day-to-day occupations. We’ve developed the misconception that the only significant occupations are “glamor” ones, or at the very least white-collar positions — CEO jobs. However, the world’s most important labor isn’t done by jazz musicians, radio and movie stars, bond salespeople, or our more than 300,000 physicians and attorneys. It is carried out by the guy with the hoe and the hammer, by the women who look after those men, their children, and their houses, and by millions of other men and women who work at desks ranging from the teacher’s desk to the more desirable tables strewn with phones and push buttons.
We are all laborers, and it seems to me that practically any well-done task is valuable. Our society is a complex machine, and machinery comprised entirely of dazzling devices would be worthless. Grease cups and other “minor” pieces must be present. Remove the tiniest of them and you’ll quickly discover that there is no such thing as a minor component. Similarly, if your water pipes broke, your phone malfunctioned, or, more importantly, if you were without food or water, you’d find the plumber, the lineman, the mechanic, and the farmer to be just as vital as the general manager or the president of the board. Each person has a certain role to play, and it takes more than a silk hat, a spotlight, or a name on the door to make that role important.
Perhaps the most important thing is that you are interested in and proud of your job. The person with a future isn’t always the one who despises what he’s doing right now. He’s the guy who feels his job is significant, thus he moves on to bigger and better employment.
Few of us realize how enormous a chore a little thing can be. “What is being a schoolma’am?” the instructor who began Edison thinking about electricity, or established the mental foundations of any other strikingly or inconspicuously beneficial person, may have remarked. “I’d want to do something significant.” Richard, the carpenter, believes I’m a superior person because I teach and write articles, but we would be able to get by without lectures and articles if we didn’t have homes. “We may survive without books, but civilized man cannot live without chefs,” said English poet Owen Meredith, referring to Mr. Richard.
It is critical to value all excellent effort. Also crucial are loyalty, compassion, and tiny acts of kindness. At the Lamb’s Club in New York, there used to be an elevator operator who went out of his way to be friendly and helpful to the members. “Pat’s burial was our largest outpouring of respect since the loss of Victor Herbert,” one of them informed me after he died not long ago. There was Edgar, the soda-water clerk who used to work on our corner and was so full of neighborly advice and enthusiasm to be everyone’s buddy and handyman that we missed him when he went away. He, as well as hundreds of other friends who are farmers, butchers, bakers, and candlestick makers, would be on my own list of significant individuals.
What matters is what you do in your career, not your job itself… When President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed that we required 50,000 aircraft for national defense, a source said that the issue was a lack of ground staff. We all want to fly, but only a small percentage of us want to tighten bolts. However, without personnel to manufacture and maintain aircraft, as well as men to transport fuel, the flyer is as earthbound as they are, and it makes no difference whether we have fifty thousand or five thousand pilots.
That understanding is critical to our advancement and survival. ‘What is the value of this in a civilisation that may be falling before our ears?’ I can destroy any morning’s work. By responding, ‘Civilization will not disintegrate while we all perform our duties,’ I can make the morning brighter and the work more productive. How can I know who it could assist, or how many, if I write as well and honestly as I can? How do I know this isn’t one of the world’s most important jobs?’
“How do you know it isn’t the same with yours?”
Isn’t “Acting Well Thy Part” just settling?
“This ‘playing well thy part’ nonsense simply seems like a cop-out for settling,” some of you may be thinking. How can I hope to establish a name for myself if I’m happy in my present job?”
“Acting properly thy part” does not imply that you must be pleased with your existing situation. It doesn’t mean that desire and goal-setting aren’t important. There’s nothing wrong with aspiring to a better job if you’re dissatisfied in your current one.
Acting your role properly simply means that you have the integrity to do your best and be as helpful as possible wherever you are. Yes, you have long-term objectives and ambitions, but you don’t allow them get in the way of performing a good job today.
Theodore Roosevelt was a real embodiment of the notion of “act well thy part.” When he was 36, he was a member of the New York City Police Board, and he handled his work with such zeal that some questioned whether he was already planning to run for President of the United States.
Roosevelt had a rather aggressive response when writer Jacob Riis posed that topic to him, as a coworker of Riis’ remembered:
“TR sprang to his feet, rushed around his desk, fists clinched, fangs bared, and seemed to be going to hit or choke Riis, who cowered away, surprised.”
TR shouted at Riis, ‘Don’t you dare ask me that!’ ‘Don’t even think about putting such thoughts into my brain.’ You—you—would never say anything like that to a buddy of mind.’
TR came to a stop when he saw Riis’ surprised expression or remembered that he had few pals as committed as Jake Riis. He stepped back, then walked up to Riis and wrapped his arm over his shoulder. Then he drew me up close and stated in an amazed tone of voice.
‘Never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, Politically, it nearly invariably kills him. He loses his cool; he can’t complete his tasks; he abandons the characteristics that make him a viable candidate. For example, I’m going to achieve big things here, difficult things that will take all of my bravery, talent, and hard work, and I’ll be able to do them if I think about them alone.’”
TR had chosen this way of life when he was a young New York assemblyman a decade before:
“At one point, I started to feel that I had a future ahead of me, and that it was incumbent upon me to be extremely foresighted, scanning each action carefully for its potential impact on that future. This quickly rendered me useless to the public and an object of aversion to myself, so I resolved not to try to think about the future at all, but instead to proceed on the assumption that each office I held would be the last one I ever held, and I would confine myself to doing my work as well as I could while in that office.”
We often claim that after we get our ideal job, we’ll truly start putting in the effort. Those who conduct half-assed work in lower-level employment are more likely to undertake half-assed work in higher-level ones. Why would an employer or customer think you’re capable of more sophisticated and significant job if you can’t execute basic, mundane labor well?
Unfortunately, I know a few males who have not grasped this concept. They’ve never “played their part well” in any job they’ve ever had, whether at work or in life. As a result, they’ve never been able to attain the objectives or earn the position they feel they “deserve.”
Acting well in a role usually requires repetition – and that’s OK.
Mike Rowe contends that creativity and imitation are two sides of the same coin, and that the world need both. We need the exhilarating labor of inventing fresh and unique things. However, in order to keep such inventions functioning, we must reproduce the component elements of those innovations over and over again.
We all desire lifestyles that allow for some creativity, yet we all have jobs that demand us to do the same thing over and over again, day in and day out. You may still find significance and satisfaction in it as long as you’re “performing well thy” role.
My father is an excellent example of this. He spent almost 30 years as a special agent for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Over those three decades, his employment didn’t alter all that much. He spent the most of his time at the office, either writing memos and reports or preparing evidence for court proceedings. During duck season, he would spend his weekends monitoring hunters, freezing his buttocks off. My father enjoyed his profession, despite the fact that it was monotonous and frequently dull.
I wondered how he could like doing the same obviously uninteresting or unenjoyable activities every day for 30 years. What was his response? “I simply focused on one day at a time and tried to give it my all.”
He did an excellent job in his role. It was a wise decision. He not only found joy in his profession, but he also excelled in it and left a legacy as one of the top agents at the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
It’s the same at work as it is at home. When you become a father, you rapidly realize that parenting is a constant cycle of waking up, washing, rinsing, and repeating. But you toughen yourself and “do thy duty” as a father since you’re an important element of your family’s “magic square.” If you fail in your position, your whole family will suffer immensely.
How Can You Play Thy Part Well?
My challenge to you today is to “do thy part” in whatever situation you find yourself in.
If you’re a young guy aspiring to play on the varsity football team but are currently a scout team “scrub,” you may still play a significant part in helping the squad win by giving your all in practice.
If you’re working in a low-paying job that doesn’t seem very exciting, seek for ways to contribute to and improve the lives of others around you, no matter how minor.
Don’t allow our culture’s concentration on financial and professional achievement blind you to the truth that fatherhood and marriage are the two most essential and gratifying vocations a man can have. Sure, many of the duties you’ll do aren’t very noteworthy, but they’re crucial.
Finally, if you’re a male, are you portraying a genuine gentleman? Men have a particular role to play in our society’s strength, but far too many have shied away from the mantle of masculinity, and we’re all suffering as a result.
The amount to which each man accepts every job he is given, whether major and little, and tries his best to magnify that role determines whether our families, teams, and communities flourish or wither and rot. The world we live in is a vast magical square, and everyone of us plays an essential part in making it a beautiful whole. You’ll find that life is far more significant and satisfying if you embrace your position in the current moment, no matter how tiny or monotonous it is, and for whatever long it lasts.
How will you play your role well?
Hisense is one of the most popular TV brands in the world, owing to its aggressive price strategy. The firm creates stunning televisions for both regular usage and particular applications such as gaming. The brand is accessible all over the globe, in addition to its one-of-a-kind price approach.
Is Hisense a Sharp product? No. The two firms do, however, have a commercial tie. Sharp’s assets and market share in North America, for example, were purchased by Hisense in 2015.
Sharp’s brand has been utilized to design and manufacture televisions in North America since then. Sharp, on the other hand, has never produced Hisense televisions.
So, who manufactures Hisense televisions? Unlike other brands that designate manufacturing and design processes, Hisense Private Limited Company designs and manufactures all of its televisions. To strengthen its global position, the corporation has also invested in plants across the globe.
Hisense TV’s Features
Hisense is a Chinese corporation that was established in 1969. Hisense Kelon Electrical and Hisense Electrical have developed into two separate enterprises since then.
Both sibling companies are presently traded on China’s main stock exchanges. Hisense controls two of the world’s largest electronics brands, Hisense and Toshiba, via the two corporations.
Hisense is not only a lucrative firm, but it is also one of China’s most significant contributions to the world of technology. Because of its unique items and unbeatable cost, it will be in over 160 countries by 2021.
Is TCL and Hisense the same company? No. Despite having a nearly identical strategy to growth, marketing, and price, the two firms are not the same.
TCL was founded 11 years after Hisense, in 1981. Hisense has also recently outperformed TCL in terms of revenue. Both, however, have their origins in China.
Hisense compared. other television brands
Hisense competes in a market crowded with high-end brands and low-cost sets. So, how do they stack up against the competition?
1. TLC vs. Hisense
Tech critics have long pointed out that Hisense and TLC are almost equal in terms of cost and technology.
In terms of image quality, the two are unrivaled among budget televisions. The decision between Hisense and TCL comes down to personal preferences based on their commonalities.
2. Which is better: Hisense or Vizio?
Many parallels exist between the two television franchises. They are, for example, synonymous with low-cost televisions. In the last three years, though, they have pursued distinct routes.
In comparison to Vizio, Hisense has invested more resources in creating superior operating systems. As a consequence, it has more user-friendly features and functions. Vizio, on the other hand, has emerged as the superior image quality of the two.
Hisense is superior than Vizio in terms of these features and competitive cost. If color fidelity is important to you, the Vizio TV series will not disappoint.
Is Hisense a reputable television manufacturer?
Yes. The Chinese television manufacturer produces some of the greatest cheap televisions. Despite the fact that other conventional TV companies, such as Sony and Samsung, offer less expensive sets, Hisense offers an unsurpassed mix of features and price.
Apart from the price, the following are some of the characteristics that make Hisense TVs worthwhile purchases:
1. Excellent image quality
The visual quality of Hisense TVs is superb. While it is unreasonable to compare the quality to high-end manufacturers such as Samsung and Sony, a good display does not have to cost more than $1000.
It’s 2021, and it’s about time you watched the game on a Hisense TV. #HisenseUpgradeSeason pic.twitter.com/CoHDkRnlrB #HisenseUpgradeSeason
January 9, 2021 — HisenseUSA (@Hisense USA)
2. Functionality and innovative features
Hisense TVs are mostly Android-based. For regular usage, the ecosystem is seamless and intuitive.
In addition, the Chinese manufacturer has improved the motion rate of its H9F series. As a result, the sets are suitable for both gaming and daily usage.
3. The best warranty for low-cost televisions
Is there a warranty for Hisense televisions? Yes. Unlike most inexpensive companies, Hisense provides strong warranty coverage for its consumers.
While the company’s options vary by location, most TVs are covered by a three-year guarantee.
Hisense’s sets are simple to fix because to the company’s technical strategy. In comparison to other brands, the components, particularly the panels, are also widely accessible.
Due to the saturation of the television industry, competition for low-cost sets has increased. Few firms, however, can match Hisense’s aggressive pricing strategy. In terms of operating systems and usability, the Chinese manufacturer also produces superb televisions.
Articles Related to This
Stephen Curry is largely regarded as the best point guard in the NBA right now, and his style of play has had a significant impact on the game. Curry is now the most dangerous guard to play against due to his unrivaled shooting and talents. As he adds to his already impressive credentials, the great point guard is obviously the MVP favorite this season. As a member of the Golden State Warriors, he won two MVP awards and three titles, putting him on the path to the Hall of Fame.
As a 6’10” forward with offensive ability both inside and beyond the paint, Kevin Durant altered the game. Because he mixes his length and shooting skills with incredible handling, the swingman may be the most unstoppable scorer of his age. Durant is a four-time scoring champion and, after LeBron James and Larry Bird, the best small forward of all time. Durant’s brilliance transcends the game since no defense in any period has been able to stop him from scoring the ball.
When comparing Durant and Curry, who has the upper hand as a superior all-around player? Both players were teammates for three years, appearing in three NBA Finals and winning two titles. Kevin Durant won both MVP awards in the Finals, but Curry has three titles to Durant’s two. It’s time to compare and contrast both outstanding players in order to determine who ranks better in the all-time rankings.
Kevin Durant led the team in scoring.
The New York Post is a newspaper based in New York
Durant is a monster when it comes to attacking the hoop and finishing on the inside. He finishes a and-1 after beating his opponent to the rim with his superb handles. Durant, on the other hand, is one of the game’s best offensive perimeter players, capable of creating his own shots and draining difficult contested jumpers in front of helpless defenders.
Curry is the top shooter in NBA history, shooting 47.7% from the field and 43.3 percent from beyond the arc. Over the course of his career, the point guard has shot 90.8 percent from the free-throw line, making him a unique marksman with incredible precision. Curry’s precision as a marksman from all around the floor has never been matched by anybody, even Durant.
However, since Curry is 6’2″, he might be frightened by larger players with length and height, but only marginally. Durant, on the other hand, has no such issue and can score against any defense in any age. Durant has a minor advantage over Curry because of his four scoring championships and all-around skill as a scorer. Steph may be the finest shooter in history, but he can’t match a 6’10” forward who can score from everywhere, despite his best efforts.
Kevin Durant’s athleticism
Kevin Durant stands at 6’10” and weighs 240 pounds. He was always a frail player with little physical edge over his opponents other than his height. Kevin Durant is a fantastic athlete who benefits from his height as a shooter and is incredibly explosive when attacking the hoop. Durant can get to the hoop from beyond the arc in only a few steps and is also good at changing his feet on defense. Other than strength, Durant’s stature offers him an edge every night, especially because he has incredible guard-like abilities.
In terms of athleticism, Stephen Curry is a tad undervalued. He has a small build and lacks the leaping ability of a great Derrick Rose or Russell Westbrook, but he is 6’2″ tall and incredibly fast with the ball. He’s quite good coming off screens off the ball, and he appears to lose men on defense. Curry’s agility and shiftiness as a player get him marks for athleticism, but he’ll never be able to match Kevin Durant’s 6’10” freak of nature.
Kevin Durant (Defense)
Kevin Durant, as good as he is on attack, can be nearly as good on defense when he zones in. Durant possesses the quickness and agility to guard lesser defenders, but his physical limitations make him struggle against larger opponents. Durant is considerably taller and stronger now than he was when he first entered the league, but he will never be a powerhouse player, which means he can only defend three spots, maybe four, when other teams utilize smaller lines.
Curry, on the other hand, is 6’2″ tall and has a career scoring average of 1.7 SPG and 0.2 BPG. Stephen Curry isn’t close to becoming a defensive stopper, except from playing passing lanes and coming up with steals owing to his fast hands. Curry has been in situations where faster and stronger guards have taken advantage of him, and there isn’t much the Golden State Warriors star can do. The game-winning shot by Kyrie Irving over Steph in the 2016 NBA Finals is an example of this.
Durant needs to take the lead in terms of defense. Due to his exceptional height and quickness on the defensive end of the court, the forward is averaging 1.1 SPG and 1.1 BPG throughout his career, edging out Curry.
Kevin Durant’s Clutch
Credit: Associated Press/Frank Franklin II
Kevin Durant has shown to be a clutch performer in the past. Durant’s ability to make jumpers from any spot on the floor makes him unstoppable on offense and capable of delivering in a pinch. Durant has routinely considered among the best clutch players of all time, whether in the regular season or the playoffs. Durant has shown he can be a big-time shot-maker when it’s most needed, as proven by his two Finals MVP Awards. Even though he was surrounded by future Hall of Famers like Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson, it was the forward who hit the game-winning jumpers in back-to-back NBA Finals.
Curry, on the other hand, has repeatedly shown that he is not as dependable as Kevin Durant. Because someone with Curry’s extraordinary ability and skill is expected to always produce in the clutch, he might control a game and then seem to burn out in crucial times. His legendary game-winning shot against the Oklahoma City Thunder in 2016 was great, but he doesn’t have any moments to compare to Durant’s. Curry has been chastised for not winning a single Finals MVP award and for playing below his usual level throughout the playoffs, which is enough to give Durant the edge. Durant, a former Oklahoma City Thunder player, is one of the most dominating players in the clutch, and most coaches would hand the ball to him in a do-or-die scenario above any other player save Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant.
Stephen Curry’s Leadership
This is an intriguing topic since both players have been criticized for their leadership qualities at times. However, based on their respective careers, Stephen Curry must be the superior leader. The explanation is straightforward: selflessness. Curry has aided and abetted the success of those around him, making each teammate a stronger player. Steph is an unstoppable attacking force who has always invited other superstars to join him on the court. Rather of hogging the limelight like most other superstars, Curry shared the attention and ultimately benefited by winning championships.
Durant has always been regarded as a fantastic player, but he lacks the aggression to put his teammates in position when it is required. Durant had to put up with Russell Westbrook shooting more shots than him and being the team’s “alpha” for years in Oklahoma City. Despite the fact that commentators yelled for Durant to take charge, he often deferred. Most essential, Durant needed to join Stephen Curry’s squad in order to reach the playoffs, which meant he couldn’t accomplish it on his own.
Stephen Curry’s Basketball IQ
Because they have consistently been the greatest players on their teams throughout their careers, both players have a high basketball IQ.
Durant’s superior basketball I.Q. is shown by his ability to lead to a bucket on every possession, whether by scoring or assisting. He’s a terrific passer, a fantastic scorer, and a complete offensive system in and of himself. Durant, along with his current colleague James Harden, is one of the league’s most dominating all-around scorers today.
Stephen Curry, on the other hand, has a somewhat higher basketball IQ than Durant. Curry seems to have been born knowing how to play the game, and he is a great student of the game. Curry has every facet of being a point guard down to a science, whether it’s ball handling, shooting, or passing. The point guard is an exceptional scorer, but he has also shown the ability to make the correct plays at the right time to help his team win games.
Both players may argue that they have a higher basketball IQ, but Curry has to win this category. Steph never has to worry about Durant’s indecisiveness when it comes to being ultra-aggressive.
Curry and Durant are difficult to compare in terms of effect. Steph is a fantastic three-point shooter who has the ability to take over games. Steph has won games on his own several times because a couple of three-pointers put his team in a fantastic position to go on a run that crushes opponents in minutes. Steph needs to be picked up as soon as he steps in front of half-court because if he gets room to shoot, it might be game over.
Durant, on the other hand, is unstoppable from anywhere on the floor. No one can shoot as good as Curry, but he is a better scorer when he attacks the hoop and can also get hot from the mid-range. Kevin is one of the top-three small forwards of all time because of his height, which allows him to shoot above opponents while still being a nuisance on defense. This one, though, must be even since Curry revolutionized the NBA game forever.
Even though it’s a one-on-one game, it’s still a
Sports Illustrated is the source of this image.
This is, once again, a tricky one to decipher. On most situations, Steph cannot be guarded by a single player because he just need a little amount of space to make his three-point shots and is also good at getting to the hoop. Curry can read plays to provide his team an edge on the fast break, even if he needs aid on defense.
Durant is unstoppable, regardless of who defends him. The only way to stop Durant, as most opposition coaches would tell you, is to hope he misses. He is close to 7 feet tall and possesses a high-arcing shot, thus no defender can genuinely challenge him. When Durant is rolling, a little physical force may throw him off, but there isn’t much anybody can do. Curry and Durant are both excellent scorers on offense, so the game is too close to call.
Evening Job –
Kevin Durant has two championships, two Finals MVPs, one MVP award, four scoring crowns, 11 All-Star appearances, and nine All-NBA teams to his credit. Durant has been in the NBA for two years longer, has dominated with two different teams, and might very well win another ring with Brooklyn in the coming years. While there have been some setbacks along the road, Durant’s individual achievements have been remarkable. Kevin’s credentials as a top-15 player ever is built as a scorer who was routinely one of the game’s top-5 players.
Meanwhile, Stephen Curry is recognized for altering the game, and his legacy, like that of other superstars before him, is cemented. Many people believe Curry is second only to Magic Johnson as the finest point guard of all time, while others rank him among the top five in his position. In any case, Stephen Curry is a great basketball player who has won three NBA championships as a consequence of his shooting prowess. Curry might not have the scoring crowns that Durant has, but he does have an additional MVP and has been the league’s face for a few years. As a consequence, both stars have enshrined themselves in the Hall of Fame, and this one should be considered even.
Kevin Durant vs. Stephen Curry 2-4
Kevin Durant wins out over Stephen Curry as the superior player in the end. As a scorer, the superstar small forward is legendary, and his size and quickness make him a greater all-around player than Curry. Steph is a superior shooter and has a case for assisting Durant in winning his lone championships, but he lacks Kevin’s ability to impact the floor in other ways. That does not diminish Steph’s magnificence, as the point guard is now the MVP favorite, and a third MVP Award would elevate his reputation to new heights. However, as things stand, Kevin Durant is the superior overall player since his stature of 6’10” combined with his guard talents is unrivaled.
Allen Iverson vs. Stephen Curry: Two Unbelievable Superstars Who Changed The Game
The Whole Story: The 1984 Draft Class contrasted. the 1996 Draft Class
Bulls dynasty versus. Warriors dynasty: Can the Bulls Win In Six Games?
Returning to Cleveland and winning a championship with Bronny James with a talented team would be the ideal way to end LeBron James’ career.
The NBA’s Mount Rushmore: The All-Time Greatest Players
Roblox developers are suing Benjamin Robert Simon, often known as Ruben Sim on the internet. A lawsuit was filed against him in California on Tuesday, accusing him of fraud and breach of contract, and seeking $1.6 million in damages.
Simon had previously been banned from the game for harassing players, using racial and homophobic insults, sexual harassment, and sharing photographs of Adolf Hitler; yet, he continued to terrify the game by hacking other users’ accounts.
His efforts reached a pinnacle when he began making “terrorist threats” to Roblox’s developers, where he and a “cybermob” of followers reportedly posted phony threats saying that an assault on the Roblox Developers Conference in San Francisco in October would occur. Because of the threats, local police and private security officers briefly shut down the venue and conducted a search to assure its safety. Simon has apparently removed several of his tweets after the sweep, which cost him $50,000.
Furthermore, the lawsuit accuses Roblox users and creators of “targeted abuse” in-game and on social media. The whole document is available to see below.
Polygondotcom has filed a lawsuit against Roblox and Ruben Sim.
Highlights of the article:
- Mike Tomlin is an American football coach. and Tony Dungy are angry that Bieniemy, Eric, the offensive coordinator for the Kansas City Chiefs, is still not a head coach.
- Patrick Mahomes’ progress has been aided greatly by Bieniemy in recent years.
- Dungy feels the Chiefs’ offensive coordinator has been denied a head coaching position due of racism.
The NFL’s coaching carousel begins to heat up around this time of year, which is fantastic news for long-suffering football fans and might give Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Eric Bieniemy with a once-in-a-lifetime chance.
The Las Vegas Raiders have an open head coaching position, and many additional clubs, including the Chicago Bears and Detroit Lions, are expected to join the club in the following weeks. Football fans should anticipate Bieniemy’s name to appear in most, if not all, searches, as it has in previous years.
Will a club eventually appoint the 1990 Heisman Trophy finalist as its head coach this year? Two Super Bowl-winning head coaches, Mike Tomlin and Tony Dungy, would want to see it happen sooner rather than later.
Eric Bieniemy’s work situation continues to irritate Mike Tomlin and Tony Dungy.
Mike Tomlin (L) and Tony Dungy (R) both want to see Eric Bieniemy, the Kansas City Chiefs’ offensive coordinator, promoted to head coach as soon as possible | Joe Sargent/Getty Images; David Eulitt/Getty Images; Brett Carlsen/Getty Images
Bieniemy interviewed for all seven head coaching positions that were available during or after the 2020 NFL season. All of those clubs picked other candidates, including the Lions, who hired Dan Campbell, the tight ends coach for the New Orleans Saints.
How’s it going with that one? Campbell has a dismal 0-10-1 and “learning on the job” after going 5-7 as the Miami Dolphins’ interim coach in 2015.
Bieniemy’s lack of head coaching possibilities has sparked intense debate, particularly in light of the Rooney Rule. Author John Feinstein talked with Dungy and Tomlin — both Black, like Bieniemy — about the NFL’s hiring policies in his new book, Raise a Fist, Take a Knee.
During the 2020-21 cycle, five of the seven head coaches appointed are white. David Culley of the Houston Texans is black, while Robert Saleh of the New York Jets is Lebanese. The only active Black head coaches in the NFL are Culley, Tomlin, and Miami’s Brian Flores.
“I’m not sure why Eric Bieniemy isn’t the head coach.” None. It’s incomprehensible to me.”
When it came to Bieniemy, Dungy, who became the first Black head coach to win a Super Bowl, went a step farther.
Dungy told Feinstein, “I believe there is racism engaged there.” “How can there not be at this point?” says the narrator. He works with the finest quarterback in the league [Patrick Mahomes], who adores him, yet no one wants to hire him.”
Bieniemy is attempting to be upbeat about his prospects, at least where he can.
The Chiefs’ offensive coordinator According to a source, Eric Bieniemy interviewed today for the Jaguars’ and Jets’ head coaching jobs. Bieniemy had interviews for the Chargers’ head coaching position on Tuesday, as well as Atlanta and Detroit, on Monday. Except for the Texans, he has now interviewed for every club with an HC position.
January 6, 2021 — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter)
Bieniemy aspires to be a head coach and is aware of his qualifications. Simultaneously, he’s reasonably attempting to avoid upsetting the balance.
Bieniemy told Feinstein that he still reminds himself, “Those occupations weren’t intended to be the positions that I obtain.” Anyone who has ever seen the Lions would probably agree with that judgment.
“I know I’m going to get a job because I know if I keep doing what I’m doing and we keep having success, someone is going to sit in a room with me and say, ‘You’re the person,’ sooner or later.” “All I have to do now is wait.”
Bieniemy also discussed the NFL’s hiring methods, including what he believes is a lack of diversity among those participating in the interview process.
“I know that when someone is hiring, they’re not necessarily looking for skill or what’s on your CV,” Bieniemy said. “They want to feel at ease with that somebody.” I haven’t had many interviews when the person doing the interview looked like myself. Or, to put it another way, where I resembled him.”
Only two of the league’s general managers, Cleveland’s Andrew Berry and Miami’s Chris Grier, are Black as of November 2021. There are just two minority owners in the NFL, neither of whom is African-American. The Jacksonville Jaguars are owned by Shad Khan, a Pakistani-American. Since 2014, Kim Pegula, who was born in South Korea but grew up in New York, has become a co-owner of the Bills.
This coaching cycle, will a club finally take a risk on Bieniemy?
Eric Bieniemy, the offensive coordinator for the Kansas City Chiefs, is still looking for a head coaching job. | Scott Winters/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
Unless anything unforeseen happens, Bieniemy should be interviewed by the majority, if not all, of the clubs with vacant head coaching vacancies. Of course, whether or if a club employs him is a another matter.
Bieniemy may want to consider going to college after his previous interactions with NFL organizations. From 2011 to 2012, he was Colorado’s offensive coordinator, but he declined the school’s head coaching post in 2020.
As of publishing, both Florida and Southern California, two of the most well-known programs, had openings. In the next days, the University of Miami may also open.
Despite the fact that the LSU Tigers need to seek a new head coach, Alabama offensive coordinator Bill O’Brien and Kentucky head coach Mark Stoops are apparently being pursued. If those two don’t work out and Jimbo Fisher remains at Texas A&M, Bieniemy makes sense there as well.
The carousel in 2021-22 still has plenty of time to heat up. Don’t be shocked if Dungy and Tomlin go on the attack again if the music stops and Bieniemy is left without a seat.
On Facebook, follow Sportscasting. @sportscasting19 is our Twitter handle.
RELATED: Kyle Shanahan Leads the 5 NFL Head Coaches Competing for Their Jobs
The website ITS Tactical is one of my favorites. Bryan Black, the site’s creator and proprietor, has done an excellent job of providing engaging information about tactical and survival abilities that avoids the “tin foil hat” attitude that many other survival and tactical sites exude. He makes his material relatable and relevant to the average person. We’ve featured ITS Tactical on the site before, and a couple of our pieces have been inspired by them. ITS has had a significant role in piqueing my interest in such topics.
But here’s the problem with my newfound interest in tactical and outdoor survival blogs/books: I’ve just read their how-tos and never tested them out for myself. Or, perhaps, I had mastered some of these abilities as a Boy Scout but hadn’t used them in years. My curiosity remained abstract; I wasn’t sure how well I’d do if I had to build a fire without matches or navigate with a compass since I hadn’t exercised these abilities in a hands-on manner.
Why didn’t I act sooner? Oh, I’ve made the standard justifications about family, employment, religious obligations, and so on. I just didn’t have time. I didn’t utilize my spare time to improve my compass or knot-tying abilities, even when I had some. Why? It’s a lot simpler to decide to go surfing on the internet than it is to go practicing fire-making. I also felt that with certain talents, I needed an expert to look over my shoulder to make sure I was doing things correctly rather than unintentionally compounding my own errors.
Fortunately, a few hands-on “man skill” camps have sprung up in recent years. Bryan established the ITS Tactical Muster three years ago. Tod Moore of Atomic Athlete produced a totally new one this year called the Vanguard. This year, both Bryan and Tod asked me to their events, which I saw as a nudge to encourage me to attempt the things I’d been reading about for the last several years. So I decided to attend both events and observe them. Last month was the Muster. I’m at the Vanguard right now, as you read this. Both events will be reviewed on this site. The Muster comes first.
The ITS Tactical Muster is a five-day program where participants study and practice wilderness, self-defense, and first-aid skills in the Texas woodlands. It’s similar to Boy Scout camp, but for adults (women are welcome too, but mostly guys come). I’ve included a summary of the experience below. Bryan waived my admittance price, but he didn’t ask me to write a review, didn’t pay me to write a review, and I have no other connection to ITS than being a fan. As a result, my opinions are solely mine!
My Squad Introduction and the Type of Guy Who Goes to Muster
Charlie Squad is my squad.
In a rental Ford Fiesta (economy class baby! ), I went down to Dallas. On my way down, I was thinking about the kind of individuals that might be there. I was concerned that there would be a bunch of Navy SEAL want tobes or crazed survivalist types, and that I wouldn’t fit in. However, after I got to the Scout ranch and began conducting the first meet and greet, I realized my fears were unfounded (and overly cynical). There were plenty of bushy beards, but these were just regular, down-to-earth guys from various walks of life who just happened to be interested in honing their tactical and survival abilities. A jeweler, a few attorneys, bankers, many first responders, and an ER surgeon were among the 31 males (and one woman) in our group. Approximately a fifth of the men were active military or veterans. The participants came from all around the nation, with roughly 90% having previously attended the Muster.
What struck me (and encouraged me!) was how they all appeared to have come for the same reason: to be helpful and competent men for their families and communities, regardless of the circumstances. Muster was an opportunity for them to acquire and practice skills that they could need in an emergency. Bryan Black deserves credit for cultivating a culture on ITS Tactical that attracts guys like these to events like Muster.
Nick and Brian, the cadets.
With my fears of spending the next five days with possible Doomsday Preppers allayed, I learnt that the 32 attendees would be split into four teams (or squads) of eight, with the squads competing against one another during the week. The victorious team will take home the prestigious paddle trophy. I was fortunate enough to be assigned to Charlie Squad. As Bryan strives to maintain Squads intact from year to year, all of the soldiers in Charlie Squad had been paired up with each other in past Musters. My teammates were all very skilled and knowledgable in a broad range of areas. Furthermore, despite a breakdown during the previous year’s final competition, they were fired up to win this year’s Muster. Despite the fact that I was a newcomer, the guys of Charlie Squad welcomed me into their circle of friendship right away. We ate together, slept on the same bunk, and spent our little spare time together throughout the week. We became fast friends since we had to work together to complete our duties and assessments. They became my honor group for the week, and they pushed me to go above and above for the team’s benefit. I hadn’t had that kind of “masculine aggressive nurturing” in a long time. It was invigorating. It brought back memories of my football days.
The prestigious Paddle Trophies.
Each day started and finished with a flag ceremony.
Accommodations and food
Sid Richardson’s Boy Scout Ranch in Bridgeport, TX, approximately an hour west of Dallas, hosted this year’s Muster. The property is massive and located on Bridgeport Lake’s shores. Each team has its own air-conditioned bunkhouse, with clean facilities and hot showers shared with the bunkhouse next door. So, we weren’t exactly roughing it, but that doesn’t bother me.
The Charlie Squad is tucking in. I put together a sausage, egg, and hashbrown biscuit sandwich for myself. I utilized the gravy in a similar way as ketchup. I’m preparing to devour it to oblivion. It was excellent.
The Scout ranch supplied the food, which included sloppy joes, breakfast burritos, biscuits and gravy, fajitas, and other Boy Scout Camp staples. I thought the meal was fantastic, however I have a rotten stomach and a raccoon-like palette. I’ll eat everything you put in front of me, and you’ll always be my buddy. As a result, I’m probably not the greatest judge of food quality.
Overall, the food and accommodations were excellent! I believe ITS Tactical has just begun to touch the surface of what they might do at Sid Richardson. They may be able to utilize the facilities again next year.
The ITS Tactical team crammed eight days of training into five days. The training started as soon as we got at the Scout ranch on Thursday afternoon. We spent very little time teaching from a PowerPoint presentation throughout all of our training sessions. We gained experience through doing. The following are some of the abilities we gained during the Muster:
Folding a Topographic Map
This was a pleasant surprise. Because topographic maps may be rather large, they might be difficult to handle. Bryan demonstrated how to fold a map such that it is simple to maintain and provides rapid access to various “quadrants” on the map.
Ranger Beads: How to Make and Use
This was an entirely new experience for me. Using a pace count, you utilize Ranger beads to keep track of how far you’ve walked. It’s a great little gadget that came in helpful during our land navigation training.
We had to keep track of how many paces it took us to walk 100 meters. We utilized that pace count to calculate distance traveled while utilizing our Ranger beads for land navigation.
How to Pick Locks, Get Around Consumer Security Devices, and Break Into Low-Cost Handgun Safes
I’m not going to lie to you. The thing I was most excited to learn at the Muster was lock picking.
Matt Fiddler of SEREPick led this class, and it was one of the most important and eye-opening things I learned during the Muster. It astounded me how simple it is to pick a lock or circumvent some home security equipment. Many of the things we believe keep us and our stuff safe and secure are merely security illusions. You can’t only depend on a lock or a security system to keep you and your loved ones secure. To really achieve stronger security, you’ll need to add many layers and use various tools and strategies (which we’ll discuss in the future).
Using Flint and Steel to Start a Fire
We had to create a fire high enough to burn through three strings for the fire building competition. Kevlar was used for the upper one. That was the most time-consuming to finish.
It was a wonderful refresher on a talent I had learned years ago but had let to degrade. The tutorial was offered by Brian Green of Brian’s Backpacking Blog. Following a brief demonstration, the teams competed to see who could construct the largest fire in the shortest amount of time.
How to Use a Compass and a Map to Navigate
For the land navigation practice, I’m plotting locations on my map.
It was wonderful to receive a refresher on something I learned in Boy Scouts but had forgotten about. Students learned how to plot locations on a topographic map, shoot azimuths, and calculate bearings in the classroom. Our teacher, ITS Tactical writer and former Navy SEAL Nick, cut classroom time to a bare minimum and got us outdoors navigating as much as possible. Being able to locate stakes in the ground with just a map and compass made me feel like a magician. It gave me a lot of confidence. If, for some reason, GPS fails during the Zombie Apocalypse, I’m certain that I’ll be able to locate a safe haven.
My favorite skill we practiced at the Muster was land navigation, which came in second after lock picking.
Different forms of signal flares may be learned and used.
Bryan gave an excellent presentation on different methods and tools for signaling for assistance or locating meet-up places. The amazing world of infrared signaling devices was exposed to me. Night vision goggles are now on my want list. I’m looking for someone to purchase these for me.
Human Tracking Techniques
John Hurth instructs a group of students in a hands-on tracking practice.
A hands-on instruction on how to track individuals in the wild was delivered by John Hurth, a veteran Army Ranger and owner of Tyr Group. Another activity that was eye-opening was this one. It’s astonishing what you can learn about a person, what he’s doing, and where he’s going just by looking at footprints, garbage, and environmental damage. We spent a few hours on the “track,” which was a dirt pit where he produced footprint examples, where John demonstrated what to look for in a footprint to discern whether a man was sprinting, limping, or walking backwards. If Gus ever gets lost in the greenbelt behind our property, I’ll know where to look for him.
We spent a lot of time looking at and examining footprints on the dirt track.
Course of Ropes
The “Leap of Faith” was very thrilling.
On Saturday, we spent the most of the day performing a ropes course, often known as a confidence course. There was a lot of fantastic team-building and comfort-zone-expanding going on. The “Leap of Faith,” where you had to leap six feet from a 20-foot telephone pole to grasp a dangling ring, was the finest part. It’s a lot tougher than it seems!
First Aid in the Wilderness
Lone Star Medics’ Caleb Causey taught a lesson on wilderness first-aid. We learnt how to assess an injured individual, make different splints for the arms and legs, clean a wound, and apply a tourniquet.
We practiced wound cleaning with hens.
Brian Green gave a brief presentation on foot care. It’s not a “sexy” subject, but when you’re out in the woods for hours on end, taking care of your pets is critical. The main point to remember is that cotton is bad for you and that you should keep your socks dry.
Getting Free from an Illegal Detention
I’m sawing my way through zip ties with a Kevlar string.
Bryan Black offered a workshop on how to break free from unlawful restrictions, notably zip ties. I’d previously used the “simply bust the zip tie open” technique. I had never heard of using a length of Kevlar rope to cut through plastic before.
I’m instructing a fellow Squad member how to break free from zip ties by using the chicken wing method. He’d finally figured it out!
We didn’t have a specific lesson for this, but we learned how to patrol and communicate silently in formation. During our last training session, this ability came in helpful.
Scenario-Based Training Exercises Put Our Knowledge to the Test
Bryan Black gets ready for the night op observation point operation with his squad.
During the Muster’s five days, we began to notice a subliminal plot that we were unwittingly a part of. My fellow Muster participants and I would soon find that the abilities we were acquiring would be put to use in two live-action, all-night “missions” or training exercises based on this plot.
The first mission was an all-night reconnaissance assignment that required us to travel to an observation location and conceal. From there, we collected the information we’d need to complete the last training exercise successfully. We took turns sleeping on the naked ground in watches, and I slept for approximately two hours. It’d been a long night.
We took part in the final training exercise, or FTX, on the penultimate night. During the FTX, the drama that had been unfolding over the weekend came to a thrilling conclusion. To finish it effectively, we had to use all of the abilities we had gained over the previous four days. The paddle trophy would be awarded to the team who performed the best during the FTX.
I’m not going to go into great depth about the plot and what transpired during the FTX since 1) it would spoil the enjoyment for future Muster attendees, and 2) Bryan requested that we not do so.
But I’ll tell you something: even though I knew it was all a ruse, I had a fun!
I felt like a small child again, playing army with my neighborhood pals, but this time I was truly “playing” with practical abilities. It was really beneficial to be able to test myself in a simulated situation in order to reinforce what I had learnt over the previous four days.
The Closing Ceremony
Our FTX Paddles with the Charlie Squad. Booyah!
It was a really low-key Monday morning. Breakfast was had, our bunks were cleaned, and we returned to the classroom for a debrief. Our cadres offered some last words of encouragement, and Bryan gave everyone the opportunity to give their thoughts on what they liked and disliked about the event. The great majority of the comments was good, and the ITS Team took the constructive input into consideration for next year. This was essentially a time for everyone to get together and swap battle experiences, as well as discuss hilarious or insightful moments from the event.
The winners of the FTX were revealed after the awards were given out. And I’m pleased to report that Charlie Squad won the Paddles. Mine is now on display in my closet/podcast studio.
The Muster was a lot of fun. I was able to acquire (or re-learn) some fantastic abilities, as well as enjoy some fantastic male camaraderie. Bryan, his wife Kelly, and the whole ITS Tactical team of instructors performed an outstanding job organizing and planning the event. Furthermore, Bryan and the teachers did an excellent job of maintaining a cheerful and productive atmosphere. I felt more knowledgeable and confident after the session, and I was inspired to continue applying what I had learned. I’ll be posting about some of the abilities I’ve picked up over the years (this month: lock picking!).
It’s easy to laugh at the thought of a group of mature men acting as commandos at a boy scout camp, but it didn’t seem strange or stupid at all. While such an event may have been corny and overdone, it was kept simple and basic. While I’m not sure whether I’ll ever need to utilize the abilities I acquired, it’s nice to know that I could if I needed to, and they’re just simple fun to try. ITS Tactical has done a fantastic job with this.
According to what I’ve learned, the Muster has progressed through time and has become better with each passing year. I believe Bryan can do much more to make the experience more immersive. During a feedback session, I suggested giving participants “homework” on fundamental skills they needed to acquire before coming to the Muster so that time could be spent delving more in-depth in a certain area.
One disadvantage, at least in my opinion, is that the Muster lasts five days and does not conclude until Monday afternoon. Getting away for that amount of time might be challenging if you’re like me and have a tremendously hectic schedule. While the duration of the Muster improves the number of talents you may acquire and the companionship, I would have wanted it to be a little shorter, finishing on Sunday, so I could return and be ready to go on Monday morning.
The cost is also not cheap: $900. However, when you consider that you receive 5 days of housing, 3 meals each day, and personal training, it’s a good deal. It’s about the cost of a week at summer camp, which is pretty much what it is. If you’re interested in going, keep an eye on the ITS website for information on how to register for the 2015 Muster in the coming months. To register, you must already be a paying member of their website, and space is usually restricted.
Overall, I would strongly advise anybody interested in learning or improving their man skills to attend a Muster. It’s a good chance to learn new things, spend time outdoors, and bond with like-minded men.
ITS Tactical owns the rights to all photographs.
Watch This Video-
- vince wilfork weight loss
- vince wilfork 40 time