Sarah Jacobson 
Insurers are increasingly using AI algorithms to analyze vast amounts of data, assess risk, estimate repair costs, and even generate settlement offers for accident claims. While this technology can streamline operations and speed up processing times, concerns are growing that these AI systems might be systematically undervaluing claims, potentially leaving policyholders undercompensated.
How AI Processes Car Accident Claims
Insurance companies employ AI in various ways throughout the claims process. Algorithms can:
- Automate Data Extraction
- Analyze Damage
- Assess Risk and Predict Outcomes
- Generate Settlement Offers
These AI systems promise efficiency, consistency, and speed, often processing simple claims much faster than traditional methods.
How to Protect Your Claim From Insurance AI Designed to Undervalue Your Settlement
AI offers potential benefits for claims processing speed and efficiency. However, the risk that these systems make insurance policies prioritize cost savings over fair compensation for accident victims is real.
A car accident attorney understands how these AI systems work (and their limitations) and can advocate for a fair settlement that accounts for all your damages, including those AI might overlook. They can challenge the insurer’s valuation and negotiate effectively on your behalf.
The Risk of Undervaluation
Despite the benefits of efficiency, several factors contribute to the risk of AI undervaluing accident claims:
Focus on Quantifiable Data
AI excels at processing numbers – medical bills, repair costs, lost wages, etc. However, it struggles to evaluate subjective, non-economic damages like pain and suffering, emotional distress (PTSD, anxiety), or the long-term impact of an injury on quality of life. If these aren’t explicitly and correctly documented in specific ways (e.g., in medical records), the AI may ignore or minimize them. Since around 9% of people suffer PTSD after a car accident, this is not good.
Algorithmic Bias
AI models learn from historical data. If this data reflects past biases (e.g., lower settlements for certain demographics or geographic areas), the AI can perpetuate or even amplify these biases, leading to unfair claim valuations for some groups.
Insurer’s Bottom Line
AI systems, particularly those like Colossus or CCC Estimating Solutions, are often designed with the insurer’s financial interests in mind. Their primary goal can be cost reduction and efficiency for the insurer, not necessarily ensuring the claimant receives the maximum fair value. The average compensation sum for a car accident is $30,416 but with AI involved, you may get offered a lot less.
Lack of Nuance and Empathy
AI lacks human judgment, context, and empathy. It cannot understand the unique circumstances of an accident or the personal toll it takes on an individual beyond the coded data points. It may flag legitimate claims as suspicious due to unusual circumstances or fail to account for future medical needs not yet explicitly documented.
The “Black Box” Problem
A significant issue is the lack of transparency surrounding these algorithms. Insurers often treat their AI systems as proprietary “black boxes,” refusing to disclose precisely how they arrive at a settlement figure. This opacity makes it incredibly difficult for claimants to understand the valuation or effectively challenge an offer they believe is too low. Vague explanations for denials or low offers leave policyholders confused and frustrated.
The focus on quantifiable data, potential for bias, and lack of transparency can lead to undervalued claims, particularly concerning non-economic damages like pain and suffering. As insurers increasingly rely on AI, vigilance from policyholders, demands for transparency, regulatory oversight, and the continued importance of human judgment are crucial to ensure technology serves fairness, not just efficiency.
About Author
